Spatio-Temporal Characteristics of Global Warming in the Tibetan Plateau during the Last 50 Years Based on a Generalised Temperature Zone - Elevation Model

Temperature is one of the primary factors influencing the climate and ecosystem, and examining its change and fluctuation could elucidate the formation of novel climate patterns and trends. In this study, we constructed a generalised temperature zone elevation model (GTEM) to assess the trends of climate change and temporal-spatial differences in the Tibetan Plateau (TP) using the annual and monthly mean temperatures from 1961-2010 at 144 meteorological stations in and near the TP. The results showed the following: (1) The TP has undergone robust warming over the study period, and the warming rate was 0.318°C/decade. The warming has accelerated during recent decades, especially in the last 20 years, and the warming has been most significant in the winter months, followed by the spring, autumn and summer seasons. (2) Spatially, the zones that became significantly smaller were the temperature zones of -6°C and -4°C, and these have decreased 499.44 and 454.26 thousand sq km from 1961 to 2010 at average rates of 25.1% and 11.7%, respectively, over every 5-year interval. These quickly shrinking zones were located in the northwestern and central TP. (3) The elevation dependency of climate warming existed in the TP during 1961-2010, but this tendency has gradually been weakening due to more rapid warming at lower elevations than in the middle and upper elevations of the TP during 1991-2010. The higher regions and some low altitude valleys of the TP were the most significantly warming regions under the same categorizing criteria. Experimental evidence shows that the GTEM is an effective method to analyse climate changes in high altitude mountainous regions

Radiometric assessment of OLCI, VIIRS, and MODIS using fiducial reference measurements along the Atlantic Meridional Transect

This is the final version. Available on open access from Elsevier via the DOI in this recordData availability Data will be made available on request.High quality independent ground measurements that are traceable to metrology standards, with a full uncertainty budget, are required for validation over the lifetime of ocean-colour satellite missions. In this paper, we used radiometric Fiducial Reference Measurements (FRM) collected during four Atlantic Meridional Transect (AMT) field campaigns from 2016 to 2019 to assess the performance of radiometric products from the Ocean and Land Colour Instrument (OLCI) aboard Sentinel-3A (S-3A) and 3B (S‐3B), the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer instrument aboard Aqua (MODIS-Aqua), and the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite instrument aboard Suomi NPP and NOAA-20 (Suomi-VIIRS and NOAA-20 VIIRS). The AMT provides one of the few sampling platforms that make high-quality in situ radiometric measurements in oligotrophic, low chlorophyll-a oceanic waters for ocean colour satellite validation. In situ data were acquired and processed following established FRM protocols, calibrated to metrology standards, referenced to inter-comparison exercises and with a full uncertainty budget. From these we selected an uncertainty threshold, which we used as part of a matchup procedure that takes into account the temporal and spatial variability of both the in situ and satellite data. Three atmospheric correction models were compared for S-3A and S‐3B OLCI radiometric products; the standard OLCI IPF-OL-2, POLYMER and NASA SeaDAS l2gen. Based on the round-robin comparison, POLYMER provided the best performance in the retrieval of water-leaving radiances. The analysis showed that Suomi-VIIRS and MODIS-Aqua performed better than NOAA-20 VIIRS, and comparably with S‐3B OLCI standard products. The S-3A OLCI standard product outperformed the NASA products. The S-3A OLCI and S‐3B OLCI instruments were also compared during their tandem phase, which showed that S‐3B OLCI radiances were systematically higher than S-3A OLCI across the spectrum.European Space AgencyNatural Environment Research Council (NERC)National Centre for Earth Observation (NCEO)UKR